![]() 02/11/2020 at 19:54 • Filed to: Future police blotter | ![]() | ![]() |
Aero jeep. As seen in Kalispell Montana. I was thinking of calling it on as it looked suspicious.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:02 |
|
“If you see something, say something...”
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:04 |
|
Remember, if anyone from the Department of Motor Vehicles asks, its a spare tire cover.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:10 |
|
The wheel fitment tells you everything you need to know about the owner.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:16 |
|
Small wheels for lower rolling resistance of course!
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:26 |
|
Even a CHMSL (maybe), nice.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:28 |
|
It looks like it, is this monstrosity somehow legal?
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:36 |
|
I think NH is some kind of supposed low regulation paradise, so I suspect if it stops and goes, it is fine. I appreciate the attention to detail though, maybe it is only 80% as sketchy as it looks.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:43 |
|
Oh no
The out- of- staters who think Montana is their fantasy playground are back
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:46 |
|
nice - kamm back jeep. Bet it’s good for 215 down the mulsann e.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 20:49 |
|
I took a quick look at New Hampshire’s inspection regulations: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rules/state_agencies/saf-c3200.html
Most of the stuff we can see here would fall under the body or chassis section. Best guess for a failure would be this:
Saf-C 3221.02
Replacement of Body or Chassis
. Any portion of the body or chassis of a vehicle which is missing or damaged shall be replaced with material(s) that meet the manufacturer’s specifications.
I think the bumper would also fail:
(a) A vehicle shall be rejected if the bumper and its structural components are:
(1) Not attached to the front and rear of a passenger or multipurpose vehicle as manufacturer intended;
It has a rear b umper, but it’s not attached to the rear of a vehicle anymore.
I’ve got a feeling there are other less obvious things that could fail it as well.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 21:03 |
|
drive free or die
amirite
![]() 02/11/2020 at 21:12 |
|
10:32am: man called to report suspiciously modified Jeep
10:35: man called to report that a stranger was looking at his Jeep
11:38: dog was running loose in playground
12:10 woman called to report her French fries had been served lukewarm
1:14: wood Jeep body blocking intersection
![]() 02/11/2020 at 21:17 |
|
NH has both safety and emissions inspections. I don’t think this would pass, but obviously it doesn’t have too much to worry about while it’s hiding out in Montana.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 21:21 |
|
There's no doubt it's a blot...
![]() 02/11/2020 at 21:43 |
|
I dunno, this might just make its own loophole. “Show me in the law where it says I can’t have a wooden bed extension on my Jeep while every other pickup more than 15 years old has a homemade wood bed on it.”
But yeah, some places would fail it from 100 feet away anyway.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:11 |
|
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:11 |
|
Certainly not legal in new hamshire
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:12 |
|
This vehicle is driving up our housing costs!
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:13 |
|
I guess that’s the “or die” part.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:14 |
|
But it looks so safe
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:33 |
|
Just why hypermile a Jeep and modify it to be useless off-road? That can't do squat except drive down a dirt lane while getting worse mpgs all around than just about anything less that can do the same.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:48 |
|
There are many questions here, and this is certainly at the top of the list.
![]() 02/11/2020 at 22:49 |
|
Well you’re the New Hampshire expert!
![]() 02/11/2020 at 23:16 |
|
Yay overlanding!
![]() 02/12/2020 at 01:44 |
|
WTF?
![]() 02/12/2020 at 08:43 |
|
Your impression is 100% wrong. NH is a real bitch to get cars on the road with safety and emission inspections. Tires past the fenders? Nope. Exhaust louder than stock? Nope. Repairs made with other than factory materials (aka metal for metal) ? CEL? No sticker for you.
I’d bet that this is all removable or he did it right after his last inspection.
![]() 02/12/2020 at 12:34 |
|
I was kind of half-joking. I guess that’s part of the “or die” part that I joked about elsewhere.
Funny, I live in a west coast area many flyover types would probably moan about being the “coastal elite” - we’ve never had mandatory inspections, and emissions inspections have been phased out. However, we also have plenty of sketchy stuff on the road. Both of your theories could be correct.